This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Vince Chhabria news.
For more Vince Chhabria news, you can click here:
more Vince Chhabria newsFor more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
licensing books. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Judge Vince Chhabria news, judge news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
plaintiffsArs Technica
•Technology
Technology
81% Informative
Judge Vince Chhabria sided with Meta in a case pitting book authors against Meta .
Authors argued that Meta 's Llama AI models could flood their markets with competing AI -generated books that could indirectly harm sales.
But a judge ruled that Meta did enough to overcome authors' other arguments regarding alleged harms by simply providing expert testimony.
VR Score
88
Informative language
92
Neutral language
24
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
