2024's AI Missteps Highlighted
This is a news story, published by MIT Technology Review, that relates primarily to AI news.
News about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsMIT Technology Review news
For more news from MIT Technology Review, you can click here:
more news from MIT Technology ReviewAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI art. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI industry news, AI news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI garbageMIT Technology Review
•Technology
Technology
The biggest AI flops of 2024
68% Informative
Generative AI makes creating reams of text, images, videos, and other types of material a breeze.
It takes just a few seconds for your model of choice to spit out a result once you enter a prompt.
And 2024 was the year we started calling this (generally poor-quality) media what it is: AI slop.
In February , a Canadian small-claims tribunal upheld the customer’s legal complaint against a chatbot.
The Rabbit R1, a ChatGPT-based personal assistant device, suffered a rash of critical reviews and reports that it was slow and buggy.
A new iPhone feature that groups app notifications together and creates summaries of their contents recently generated a false BBC News headline.
VR Score
56
Informative language
48
Neutral language
24
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
14
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links