This is a Wuhan news story, published by Gizmodo, that relates primarily to covid-19 news.
For more Wuhan news, you can click here:
more Wuhan newsFor more covid-19 news, you can click here:
more covid-19 newsFor more epidemics & outbreaks news, you can click here:
more epidemics & outbreaks newsFor more news from Gizmodo, you can click here:
more news from GizmodoOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about epidemics & outbreaks, you might also like this article about
lab leak theory. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest lab leak news, dangerous virus research news, news about epidemics & outbreaks, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
laboratory leakGizmodo
•Health
Health
70% Informative
The Central Intelligence Agency has officially changed its stance on how the covid-19 pandemic first began.
In an assessment released over the weekend , the agency said it now believes the coronavirus responsible for the pandemic most likely leaked out from a lab in Wuhan , China , rather than from direct animal-to-human transmission.
The agency has not ruled out the possibility that covied-19 may have emerged naturally.
“The lab leak’ furthers political objectives of the Trump administration, including shutting down infectious disease and vaccine research, eliminating public health, eroding trust in science and scientists, and exacting retribution against perceived political opponents,” Rasmussen said. “It is in service of those goals this assessment was changed and is not a scientific change.”.
VR Score
70
Informative language
71
Neutral language
32
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
67
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
12
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
