Condé Nast Sues Cohere
This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Vox Media news.
Vox Media news
For more Vox Media news, you can click here:
more Vox Media newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI startup Cohere today. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI licensing news, lawsuit news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
trademark infringementArs Technica
•Technology
Technology
Condé Nast, other news orgs say AI firm stole articles, spit out “hallucinations”

81% Informative
AI startup Cohere accused of "systematic copyright and trademark infringement" by using news articles to train its language model.
Condé Nast , Forbes , The Guardian , Insider, the Los Angeles Times , McClatchy , Newsday , The Plain Dealer , Politico , The Republican , the Toronto Star , and Vox Media sued.
Cohere calls the lawsuit "misguided and frivolous," says it stands by its practices.
VR Score
83
Informative language
81
Neutral language
62
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links