Trump's firings spark lawsuits
This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
Donald Trump news
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
presidential authority. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest executive orders news, executive order news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
presidential discretionWashington Examiner
•US Politics
US Politics
Trump’s executive strategy tests presidential powers
81% Informative
President Donald Trump has fired more than a dozen federal officials in less than a month into his presidency.
Several officials have filed lawsuits arguing these dismissals violate legal protections Congress established to prevent politically motivated firings.
A federal judge temporarily reinstated special counsel Hampton Dellinger , an appointee under former President Joe Biden , is among the officials filing lawsuits.
At the heart of Trump ’s strategy is a legal doctrine long embraced by conservative legal scholars.
The doctrine, known as the "unitary executive theory," asserts that the Constitution vests all executive power solely in the president.
The path toward the Supreme Court embracing such a theory is less clear, but some experts have said the culmination of cases challenging various actions Trump has enacted thus far could incentivize the court to address it.
Legal experts are sharply divided about whether the justices would be willing to reexamine the core understanding of the 14th Amendment that has long guaranteed citizenship to anyone born in the country regardless of the legal status of their parents.
Shu noted that challenges to Trump ’s executive orders on matters such as birthright citizenship could be viewed as part of a similar legal test over constitutional interpretation.
VR Score
82
Informative language
82
Neutral language
24
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
75
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
22
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links