Uninhabitable forests better for biodiversity
This is a news story, published by ScienceDaily, that relates primarily to habitat news.
biology news
For more biology news, you can click here:
more biology newsScienceDaily news
For more news from ScienceDaily, you can click here:
more news from ScienceDailyAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about
fragmented landscapes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest undisturbed forests news, biodiversity news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
fragmented landscapeScienceDaily
•Science
Science
Want to preserve biodiversity? Go big
82% Informative
Ecologists agree that habitat loss and the fragmentation of forests reduces biodiversity in the remaining fragments.
But ecologists don't agree whether it's better to preserve many smaller, fragmented tracts of land or larger, continuous landscapes.
Findings suggest that generalist species -- species that are good at surviving in various environments -- primarily live in fragmented areas.
This study resulted from a global collaboration of ecologists, supported by the University of Michigan , says Sanders .
"I don't know if it's useful to think about continuous vs. fragmented landscapes. We need to protect biodiversity and I think this debate is not helping to actually support conservation," he says.