HIV Elimination Uncertain Post-Trump Cuts
This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Pepfar news.
News about epidemics & outbreaks
For more epidemics & outbreaks news, you can click here:
more epidemics & outbreaks newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about epidemics & outbreaks, you might also like this article about
HIV spending. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Aids Relief news, HIV treatment news, news about epidemics & outbreaks, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
HIV programmesGuardian
•Health
Health
‘It’s back to drug rationing’: the end of HIV was in sight. Then came the cuts

78% Informative
Experts are talking about building a new approach that would make health services less vulnerable to the whims of a foreign power.
Many fell under the President’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief ( Pepfar ) programme, which has been the backbone of global efforts to tackle HIV and Aids.
The global community had been making headway towards the United Nations ’ goal of ending Aids by 2030 .
But now worries about HIV/Aids prevention “falling off the radar completely” There have already been calls for new ways of doing things.
It is “time for African leadership”, members of the African -led HIV Control Working Group write in the Lancet Global Health .
VR Score
78
Informative language
74
Neutral language
56
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
13
Source diversity
11
Affiliate links
no affiliate links