White House Reacts to Judges
This is a Washington news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Peter Baker news.
Washington news
For more Washington news, you can click here:
more Washington newsPeter Baker news
For more Peter Baker news, you can click here:
more Peter Baker newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
federal judges. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest judges news, chief White House correspondent news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal judgeTheplatform
•US Politics
US Politics
Fmr. DoD official explains why the Signal group chat was classified the moment it was created
63% Informative
Peter Baker , MSNBC political analyst and chief White House correspondent for The New York Times , and Alex Wagner , adjunct law professor at Syracuse University .
Baker : The White House reacts with aggression to judges' rulings against them.
Wagner: It's part of a larger pattern that this president has indicated in 10 weeks in which he's trying to shut down alternate or competing centers of power in Washington .
National security adviser Mike Waltz has been weakened in Trump 's eyes by this, says CNN 's Peter Bergen .
He says the question is whether or not Trump , you know, chooses to do anything. He is basically saying he's not going to take action against them. That doesn't seem to be happening now. It is possible that the president eventually decides he wants to get rid of one or both.
This is the same week that the administration went to court and said that it will not tell a federal judge what time a plane of migrants landed in El Salvador or what time it took off.
The administration invoked this what this called the state secrets privilege.
At the same time, they're saying that information about an upcoming military strike, including the specific times that the warplanes would be hitting the targets is somehow not classified.
VR Score
70
Informative language
69
Neutral language
78
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
37
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links