This is a Dallas news story, published by ESPN, that relates primarily to Matt LaFleur news.
For more Dallas news, you can click here:
more Dallas newsFor more Matt LaFleur news, you can click here:
more Matt LaFleur newsFor more football news, you can click here:
more football newsFor more news from ESPN, you can click here:
more news from ESPNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
Packers proposal. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Packers news, NFL head coach news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Green Bay PackersESPN
•Sports
Sports
75% Informative
Green Bay Packers' proposal to ban the push sneak, popularly known as the tush push, has support in the competition committee.
The league office staff presented the rules proposals during the football operations meeting.
Two sources in the meeting described the back and forth as "heated" regarding the proposal.
Packers head coach Matt LaFleur has not spoken publicly about the team's proposal, and declined to comment.
Dallas Cowboys co-owner Stephen Jones : "We're looking for consistency as a committee, and we don't allow pushing" An NFL head coach says he thinks the proposal is motivated by pettiness because some clubs don't have quarterbacks capable of running a push sneak.
The owners of all 32 clubs are expected to vote on all proposals Tuesday morning .
VR Score
84
Informative language
87
Neutral language
73
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
44
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
