Recording used in divorce trial
This is a news story, published by vancouversun, that relates primarily to Karrie A. Wolfe news.
Karrie A. Wolfe news
For more Karrie A. Wolfe news, you can click here:
more Karrie A. Wolfe newscelebrity news
For more celebrity news, you can click here:
more celebrity newsvancouversun news
For more news from vancouversun, you can click here:
more news from vancouversunAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like celebrity news, you might also like this article about
marriage counselling. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest divorce trials news, recording outweighs news, celebrity news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
divorce trialvancouversun
•Entertainment
Entertainment
B.C. judge allows a secret recording that wife made of marriage counselling

70% Informative
The husband applied to have the court hear the two-hour tape made in 2020 before the couple had separated.
The husband argued the recording could show how they interacted better than their 4-year-old memories would.
Justice Karrie A. Wolfe wrote that she needed to determine if the value of the recording outweighs the “potential prejudice of admitting it.
Wolfe allowed the tape because she said she doesn’t know if it would be relevant without hearing it first .
VR Score
83
Informative language
88
Neutral language
88
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources