NCAA Settlement Opposed by Objectors
This is a news story, published by USA Today, that relates primarily to Claudia Wilken news.
Claudia Wilken news
For more Claudia Wilken news, you can click here:
more Claudia Wilken newsother sports news
For more other sports news, you can click here:
more other sports newsUSA Today news
For more news from USA Today, you can click here:
more news from USA TodayAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like other sports news, you might also like this article about
NCAA settlement. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest incoming athletes news, certain athletics revenues news, other sports news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
lawsuitsUSA Today
•Sports
Sports
NCAA settlement that would allow NIL revenue sharing with college athletes faces objections
78% Informative
Lawyers for various objectors and objector groups combined to make 12 filings during one-day window.
At issue is the outcome of a 10-year settlement that includes $2.8 billion in damages from the NCAA and the conferences.
It's expected that Judge Claudia Wilken will not seek further filings from either side in the matter.
Attorneys representing Florida State quarterback Thomas Castellanos make a motion to strike from the proposed settlement.
This argument contends that the initial settlement language regarding the CFP was insufficient for athletes to make fully informed decision about whether to opt out.
If successful, this approach to objecting to the settlement could delay its implementation.
VR Score
86
Informative language
90
Neutral language
75
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links