AI Misuse in Defamation Case
This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Mike Lindell news.
Mike Lindell news
For more Mike Lindell news, you can click here:
more Mike Lindell newsNews about Us circuit and appeals courts
For more Us circuit and appeals courts news, you can click here:
more Us circuit and appeals courts newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us circuit and appeals courts, you might also like this article about
defamation case. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest lawsuit news, disciplinary proceedings news, news about Us circuit and appeals courts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
defective citationsArs Technica
•US Politics
US Politics
Mike Lindell’s lawyers used AI to write brief—judge finds nearly 30 mistakes

87% Informative
A lawyer representing MyPillow and its CEO Mike Lindell in a defamation case admitted using artificial intelligence in a brief that has nearly 30 defective citations, a federal judge said.
The judge ordered attorneys Christopher Kachouroff and Jennifer DeMaster to show cause as to why the court should not sanction the defendants, law firm, and individual attorneys.
VR Score
93
Informative language
94
Neutral language
71
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
78
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links