Senators Probe Civil Rights Division
This is a news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to Justice Department news.
News about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsYahoo news
For more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
civil rights division. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Democratic senators news, senators news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Civil Rights ActReuters
•US Politics
US Politics
Democratic senators question US Justice Department on civil rights changes
80% Informative
Seven Democratic senators write to Justice Department asking for information about changes to civil rights division.
They say recent moves appear to be an attempt to cajole career officials to leave the division.
The Justice Department last week took steps to reassign about a dozen senior career attorneys from the unit.
VR Score
90
Informative language
96
Neutral language
51
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
81
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links