This is a Minnesota news story, published by torontosun.
For more Minnesota news, you can click here:
more Minnesota newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from torontosun, you can click here:
more news from torontosunOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
racial slur. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest racist behavior news, racist slurs news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
racist slurtorontosun
•US Politics
US Politics
71% Informative
A video showing a Minnesota woman openly admitting to using a racist slur against a Black child has garnered millions of views.
The woman, who could not be reached for comment, has since amassed over $700,000 through Christian fundraising platform GiveSendGo for relocation expenses.
The flurry of monetary contributions has reignited multiple debates, from whether racist language and attacks are becoming more permissible to the differences between “cancel culture’ and “consequence culture”.
Donators on the woman’s GiveSendGo page unabashedly used racist language against the boy.
Others excused her behaviour as acting out of aggravation.
Social media websites and crowdfunding platforms have helped people around the world speak with each other and with their wallets.
VR Score
69
Informative language
65
Neutral language
47
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
possibly hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
