Michael Saylor Criticizes Proof-of-reserves
This is a news story, published by CoinGape, that relates primarily to Michael Saylor news.
Michael Saylor news
For more Michael Saylor news, you can click here:
more Michael Saylor newscrypto trading & speculation news
For more crypto trading & speculation news, you can click here:
more crypto trading & speculation newsCoinGape news
For more news from CoinGape, you can click here:
more news from CoinGapeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like crypto trading & speculation news, you might also like this article about
Strategic Crypto Reserve. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest insecure proof news, Publishing Proof news, crypto trading & speculation news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Bitcoin proponentCoinGape
•Business
Business & Economics
Bitcoin expert Michael Saylor says publishing proof-of-reserves is a bad idea

58% Informative
Strategy founder Michael Saylor has sparked controversy with his surprising comment on proof-of-reserves.
Saylor cites security concerns, sparking controversy.
While some support his view, others question Saylor 's approach to transparency in the crypto space.
This development comes following MicroStrategy ’s latest addition of 4,020 Bitcoins to 580,250 BTC.
VR Score
40
Informative language
33
Neutral language
40
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
56
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links