AI Misuse in Legal Research
This is a Wales news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Victoria Sharp news.
Wales news
For more Wales news, you can click here:
more Wales newsVictoria Sharp news
For more Victoria Sharp news, you can click here:
more Victoria Sharp newsNews about Ai startups
For more Ai startups news, you can click here:
more Ai startups newsTechCrunch news
For more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai startups, you might also like this article about
reliable legal research. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest lawyer news, AI news, news about Ai startups, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
lawyersTechCrunch
•Technology
Technology
Lawyers could face ‘severe’ penalties for fake AI-generated citations, UK court warns | TechCrunch

78% Informative
The High Court of England and Wales says lawyers need to take stronger steps to prevent the misuse of artificial intelligence in their work.
In a ruling tying together two recent cases, Judge Victoria Sharp wrote that generative AI tools like ChatGPT “are not capable of conducting reliable legal research” That doesn’t mean lawyers cannot use AI in their research, but she said they have a professional duty “to check the accuracy of such research by reference to authoritative sources”.
VR Score
82
Informative language
83
Neutral language
50
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links