Bipartisan Kids Online Safety
This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Biden news.
Biden news
For more Biden news, you can click here:
more Biden newstech giants news
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsVerge news
For more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
Kids Online Safety Act. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest online safety reform news, online safety bill news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
bipartisan online safety rulesVerge
•Technology
Technology
Republicans are barreling toward remaking the internet

79% Informative
The Federal Trade Commission workshop on Wednesday was more aggressively partisan than past tech-focused events.
The event was originally announced with the milder tagline “Monopolizing Kids’ Time Online ” at the end of the Biden administration.
With Republicans in control of all three branches of government, the tone has shifted.
Congress passed the Take It Down Act this year , but the future of KOSA and other bills remains uncertain.
Even the Cato Institute called the event “a one -sided airing of grievances against tech companies” “Small tech innovators like our members can offer essential, real-world expertise,” ACT | The App Association wrote.
VR Score
80
Informative language
77
Neutral language
63
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links