Albertans Criticize Smith's Speech
This is a news story, published by edmontonjournal, that relates primarily to Danielle Smith news.
Danielle Smith news
For more Danielle Smith news, you can click here:
more Danielle Smith newsNews about Australia politics
For more Australia politics news, you can click here:
more Australia politics newsedmontonjournal news
For more news from edmontonjournal, you can click here:
more news from edmontonjournalAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Australia politics, you might also like this article about
historical grievances Alberta. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Alberta Next panel news, Albertans news, news about Australia politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
weekly communications reportedmontonjournal
•World
World
Three-quarters of emails to Smith on 'path forward' address called remarks divisive: Government report
67% Informative
Three-quarters of Albertans who wrote to Premier Danielle Smith characterized her remarks as divisive.
The same proportion expressed opposition to a separation referendum.
Video of Smith delivering an 18-minute speech was posted across her social media channels and to the government’s news site.
The speech drew a strong response, according to a government report obtained by Postmedia .
VR Score
69
Informative language
65
Neutral language
75
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
8