This is a Oklahoma City Thunder news story, published by Yahoo Sports, that relates primarily to Mark Daigneault news.
For more Oklahoma City Thunder news, you can click here:
more Oklahoma City Thunder newsFor more Mark Daigneault news, you can click here:
more Mark Daigneault newsFor more basketball news, you can click here:
more basketball newsFor more news from Yahoo Sports, you can click here:
more news from Yahoo SportsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like basketball news, you might also like this article about
Oklahoma City Thunder. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Pacers news, playoffs news, basketball news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Indiana PacersYahoo Sports
•Sports
Sports
73% Informative
Oklahoma City Thunder lost 116-107 to the Indiana Pacers in Game 3 of the NBA Finals.
The Pacers outplayed the Thunder the majority of the game, coach Mark Daigneault says.
The Thunder , the NBA 's best free-throw shooting team, missed seven of their 30 attempts.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander : "It felt like they won all the 50/50 plays".
It would be easy to blame this on the Thunder 's youth, their inexperience at this level of basketball.
But it is not like Indiana has been here before, and the Pacers have no more experience than OKC on this stage.
The winner of a pivotal Game 3 has won the series 80.5% of the time.
Should the Pacers manage to take Game 4 , too, that figure would increase to 95.6% .
VR Score
85
Informative language
89
Neutral language
63
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
29
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
