This is a news story, published by Yahoo Sports, that relates primarily to NCAA news.
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Yahoo Sports, you can click here:
more news from Yahoo SportsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
NCAA settlement. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest NCAA news, college sports news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
College athletesGuardian
•US Politics
US Politics
81% Informative
The NCAA agreed to pay $ 2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image and likeness ( NIL ) Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal.
They argue the deal violates Title IX , the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education.
They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men’s basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn .
Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year .
However, the NCAA 's new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly will still go ahead.
VR Score
86
Informative language
87
Neutral language
65
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
45
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
